Github Label: ICEBreaker-Cleanup-Crew
The "Cleanup Crew" are focused on improving bug reports. Specifically, the goal is to try to ensure that every bug report has all the information that will be needed for someone to fix it:
- a minimal, standalone example that shows the problem
- links to duplicates or related bugs
- if the bug is a regression (something that used to work, but no longer does), then a bisection to the PR or nightly that caused the regression
This kind of cleanup is invaluable in getting bugs fixed. Better still, it can be done by anybody who knows Rust, without any particularly deep knowledge of the compiler.
Let's look a bit at the workflow for doing "cleanup crew" actions.
Here the ultimate goal is to produce an example that reproduces the same problem but without relying on any external crates. Such a test ought to contain as little code as possible, as well. This will make it much easier to isolate the problem.
However, even if the "ultimate minimal test" cannot be achieved, it's still useful to post incremental minimizations. For example, if you can eliminate some of the external dependencies, that is helpful, and so forth.
It's particularly useful to reduce to an example that works in the Rust playground, rather than requiring people to checkout a cargo build.
There are many resources for how to produce minimized test cases. Here are a few:
- The rust-reduce tool can try to reduce code automatically.
- pnkfelix's Rust Bug Minimization Patterns blog post
- This post focuses on "heavy bore" techniques, where you are starting with a large, complex cargo project that you wish to narrow down to something standalone.
If you are on the "Cleanup Crew", you will sometimes see multiple bug reports that seem very similar. You can link one to the other just by mentioning the other bug number in a Github comment. Sometimes it is useful to close duplicate bugs. But if you do so, you should always copy any test case from the bug you are closing to the other bug that remains open, as sometimes duplicate-looking bugs will expose different facets of the same problem.
For regressions (something that used to work, but no longer does), it is super useful if we can figure out precisely when the code stopped working. The gold standard is to be able to identify the precise PR that broke the code, so we can ping the author, but even narrowing it down to a nightly build is helpful, especially as that then gives us a range of PRs. (One other challenge is that we sometimes land "rollup" PRs, which combine multiple PRs into one.)
To help in figuring out the cause of a regression we have a tool called cargo-bisect-rustc. It will automatically download and test various builds of rustc. For recent regressions, it is even able to use the builds from our CI to track down the regression to a specific PR; for older regressions, it will simply identify a nightly.
To learn to use cargo-bisect-rustc, check out this blog post, which
gives a quick introduction to how it works. Additionally, there is a Guide
which goes into more detail on how to use it. You can also ask questions at
the Zulip stream
#t-compiler/cargo-bisect-rustc, or help in
improving the tool.